There’s a great deal of chatter that abounds about
reporting, and too many sites for me to identify as to which ones may be best for
you to visit. There are hundreds of
options available and the sites out there can be varied in their content. Many are sales-oriented and should be avoided. To get a list together have a tech-savvy
person and a business person to review the major products and then look at them
in more detail – this is not a small job but, if looking to invest a great deal
of money in a product, don’t leave it to people who don’t understand the end-to-end
process of what is involved.
There are all sorts of processes out there to decide what
your path and direction should be for deciding on a reporting solution. The bottom line is that if you let the
business side of the organisation decide the best way to go, “you will end up
with a solution that will never work and will have to go back to the drawing
board”. If you let the technical side of
the organisation decide the best way to go, “you will end up with a solution
that will never work and will have to go back to the drawing board”. Sorry, but this is worth repeating.
Both the above approaches will involve carrying out a
continuous review of the solution to get it right. This seems to be the approach that most
organisations take, thereby giving mediocre business analysts a job for life –
the good business analysts resolve a problem and move on and don’t want to
become embroiled in any process that would need a continuous review of the
delivered product ad infinitum.
Don’t get me wrong - any business process needs to include
an on-going process review but, when you’re set a task to be completed and it’s
nowhere near the needs of the organisation, cut and run. Otherwise, you are throwing money at a bad
solution that should be dropped but hasn’t been, because the lead(s) couldn’t
find their nose (replaced by
me – see reference) with both hands.
There is a simple solution.
Get someone who knows a bit about the technical side from the business
and get someone who knows a bit about the business from the technical side and
let them start talking – the most important thing is communication between
teams within your organisation. All you
do is get two people who want to do their best for the organisation and get
them talking. It’s really not that
difficult – read as many papers as you want and it’s just a lot of turgid words
around this. I came from the other side
of the desk – Finance- and have (mostly) had great relationships with people
like that, but that’s another story for another day. It’s always tough at the start because you are
both coming from completely different directions to try and achieve the same
solution. It’s “us and them”, then “can’t
you do better”, then “I’m sure we can do better” and, finally, “I think we got
it”. Then it works – and it is then that
you realise why you love your job.
Look at the last paragraph – you don’t find the job
specifications for that. It is not
inherent, it is not innate - it has to be learnt with experience. I like the expression that “We have two ears and
one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak”. It’s by Epictetus and I had to look it up but
it is sage advice. If we listen, we
learn. Even running a little team like
one designing a report, we can do it by listening and talking with each other -
communication again!
Reports
are what the leaders of an organisation want.
They don’t have time to analyse and digest all the data so give them
what they want. Clear, concise reporting
– I would also add correct (or exact) data, and that is where my expertise lies.
No comments:
Post a Comment